Current Watch
Recorded SNZ evidence, guidance, policy, parliament, media and campaign monitoring. Statuses and expected events describe each saved snapshot; they do not establish current law, implementation or service availability.
Latest recorded card check: 2026-10-09. Checks, card updates, source publication dates and scheduled review dates are separate. This page does not poll the sources.
Recorded watch cards
Showing 1-6 of 12 matching cards (12 total). Search matches recorded text, including uncertainty; a match is not confirmation of an outcome.
Retirement Villages Amendment Bill
Recorded check: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-15
- Recorded policy status
- September 2026 decisions announced; legislation pending
- Recorded bill stage
- Official reform page says introduction in the next Parliamentary term
- Why it matters
- September proposals replace a 12-month repayment limit with 9 months and propose an initial 10% repayment within four weeks for former residents leaving to live elsewhere. Exemptions and transition rules remain material.
- Next expected event in this snapshot
- Bill introduction in the next Parliamentary term, followed by select committee scrutiny; no calendar deadline is confirmed on the official page.
- Suggested SNZ action
- Use the official page updated 18 September 2026. Treat changes as proposals until enacted; distinguish new-ORA repayment transitions from proposed fee and capital-loss protections for existing ORAs.
- Implications for providers
- Potential changes to cash-flow timing, contracts, disclosure, complaints, and operating processes.
- Implications for residents
- Potential stronger exit-payment, fee, capital-loss, disclosure, and dispute protections.
- Implications for families
- Due-diligence and financial-planning guidance will need updating when final provisions and transition rules are known.
- Implications for investors
- Repayment timing and transition settings may affect liquidity, development, and valuation assumptions.
Mapped evidence: 3 documents, 2 source signals, 1 tracker
Mapped source signals (2)
Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-15
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Official reform page for the Retirement Villages Act review, bill timing, public consultation, and implementation pathway.
Suggested source action: Monitor for bill introduction, select committee timing, consultation documents, and code-of-practice updates.
Evidence note: Official page updated 18 September 2026: revised repayment proposals and bill introduction in the next Parliamentary term. Changes remain subject to legislation, exemptions, and transition rules.
New Zealand Parliament | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-06-29
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Authoritative status source for introduction, readings, committee referral, amendments, and Royal assent.
Suggested source action: Check weekly for seniors-sector bills and create a dated capture when a relevant bill changes stage.
Evidence note: Historical parliamentary check on 22 June 2026 located no Retirement Villages Amendment Bill result. That check predates the September reform update; use the separately checked reform source for next-term timing and recheck Parliament before asserting a current bill stage.
Recorded tracker status: Active — Revised proposals; bill next Parliamentary term | Priority: High | Tracker updated: 8 October 2026
Recorded next milestone: Bill introduction in the next Parliamentary term; no confirmed calendar deadline.
Mapped evidence documents (3)
Library synthesis; official update from housing ministry (now MCERT) | Brief | Recorded class: Community knowledge
Published: 2026-06-20 | Accessed: June 2026
Evidence boundary: Local watch originally published 20 June 2026 and captured that month, supplemented by an independently read official page updated 18 September 2026. The latest official timetable and revised policy proposals replace older introduction predictions; they do not prove an enacted amendment or current payment rights. Historic stakeholder counts, anecdotes and political positions are retained in the source brief with their original date and have not been independently revalidated in this review.
NZ Legislation | PDF
Published: 2003 | Accessed: June 2026
Retirement Commission | PDF
Published: 2008 | Accessed: June 2026
Recorded publication status: published | Public record: Yes
Aged-care funding and service-model reform
Recorded check: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
- Recorded policy status
- 40 independent recommendations published 17 August 2026
- Why it matters
- A Place to Grow Old proposes service integration, regulatory and funding reform. The Ministry's August report and September FAQs provide a new evidence baseline, while recommendations still require government decisions.
- Next expected event in this snapshot
- Government decisions on recommendations, funded implementation responsibilities, and service-model changes; the publication page does not confirm an implementation deadline.
- Suggested SNZ action
- Build a recommendation-by-recommendation decision log from the advisory report; retain the earlier Health NZ review as background and distinguish recommended, approved, funded, and implemented actions.
- Implications for providers
- Contract and funding changes may alter service mix, viability, and reporting obligations.
- Implications for residents
- Access, continuity, location, and quality depend on the resulting service model.
- Implications for families
- Assessment, hospital discharge, home support, and care-cost pathways may change.
- Implications for investors
- Funding certainty and capital requirements remain key operating-risk variables.
Mapped evidence: 4 documents, 3 source signals, 1 tracker
Mapped source signals (3)
Ministry of Health / Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group | Official page | Recorded signal status: Already in library | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Independent advisory report published 17 August 2026 with 40 recommendations on service integration, regulation, funding, and implementation.
Suggested source action: Capture the report, summary, and September FAQ update in the document library; track government decisions and funding separately from recommendations.
Evidence note: Official publication page checked 8 October 2026. Report publication date: 17 August 2026; supporting FAQs updated September 2026. Advice informs future policy and funding decisions; the page does not establish adopted reforms.
Health New Zealand | Official page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Core live source for aged-care funding, service-model reform, and government sequencing.
Suggested source action: Monitor for review updates and capture a source brief whenever milestones, reports, or consultation papers appear.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Health New Zealand | PDF | Recorded signal status: Already in library | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Earlier official review evidence for aged residential care and home/community support sustainability; read alongside the August 2026 Ministerial Advisory Group report.
Suggested source action: Retain doc-0487 as review background and use the August 2026 advisory report for the newer structural reform recommendations.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Recorded tracker status: Active — Advisory report published; government decisions watch | Priority: High | Tracker updated: 8 October 2026
Recorded next milestone: Government decisions, funding, and implementation responsibilities for advisory recommendations.
Mapped evidence documents (4)
Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2026-08-17 | Accessed: 8 October 2026
Evidence boundary: The report contains independent recommendations to inform government decisions. Publication does not prove that recommendations are adopted, funded or implemented. Publication date is from the Ministry landing page, separate from this verification date.
Health New Zealand | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2024-01-16 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Bundled PDF cover and official indexed publisher metadata establish January 2024. Direct Health NZ browser retrieval was restricted. Regional occupancy figures cite the NZACA 2023 survey; original response sample and bed denominator were not independently established in this capture. Preserve those limits and reference periods.
Ministry of Health | PDF
Published: 2025 | Accessed: June 2026
Ministry of Health | PDF | Recorded class: Official guidance
Published: 2025-11-27 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Dated ministerial accountability expectations, not proof that service improvements have occurred. Bundled ten-page primary PDF inspected; aged-care passage is on physical PDF page 7.
Recorded publication status: published | Public record: Yes
ARC quality, certification, closures, and capacity
Recorded check: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
- Recorded policy status
- Recurring operational watch
- Why it matters
- National funding announcements do not show where beds, audits, corrective actions, closures, and hospital-discharge pressure are concentrated.
- Next expected event in this snapshot
- New audit reports, certification changes, closure reports, and regional capacity signals.
- Suggested SNZ action
- Build a facility-level register from official certification records before drawing provider or regional conclusions.
- Implications for providers
- Audit patterns and local shortages affect staffing, admissions, reputation, and investment.
- Implications for residents
- Certification and capacity affect choice, distance from whānau, and continuity of care.
- Implications for families
- Families need current facility-level evidence rather than national averages.
- Implications for investors
- Closure, certification, and concentration signals are material operating-risk indicators.
Mapped evidence: 2 documents, 3 source signals, 1 tracker
Mapped source signals (3)
Ministry of Health | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Updated provider list and audit reports are live facility-level intelligence for quality, corrective actions, and regional risk.
Suggested source action: Use as a recurring source for facility audit intelligence rather than a one-off static PDF.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Health and Disability Commissioner | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Statutory oversight | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Published decisions provide evidence about recurring care, communication, medication, staffing, consent, and complaint failures.
Suggested source action: Run a monthly aged-care and home-support scan and code themes without personal identifiers.
Evidence note: Use only published decisions and retain HDC identifiers; do not create identifiable case dossiers.
Ombudsman | PDF | Recorded signal status: Already in library | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: High-authority rights and monitoring source for residential-care conditions, safeguards, and accountability.
Suggested source action: Keep linked to aged-care quality, safeguarding, and consumer-rights strategy work.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Recorded tracker status: Active — Advisory report published; government decisions watch | Priority: High | Tracker updated: 8 October 2026
Recorded next milestone: Government decisions, funding, and implementation responsibilities for advisory recommendations.
Mapped evidence documents (2)
Health New Zealand | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2024-01-16 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Bundled PDF cover and official indexed publisher metadata establish January 2024. Direct Health NZ browser retrieval was restricted. Regional occupancy figures cite the NZACA 2023 survey; original response sample and bed denominator were not independently established in this capture. Preserve those limits and reference periods.
Recorded publication status: published | Public record: Yes
Aged-care workforce, pay equity, and immigration
Recorded check: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
- Recorded policy status
- Multiple policy and employment settings
- Why it matters
- Pay, training, immigration, staffing, travel costs, and retention jointly determine service capacity and care quality.
- Next expected event in this snapshot
- Pay-equity, workforce-funding, immigration, and provider-response updates.
- Suggested SNZ action
- Maintain a role-by-role timeline. Check care-worker residence eligibility separately from nursing Green List pathways, and distinguish employment guidance, individual claims, litigation, and advocacy.
- Implications for providers
- Workforce cost and availability directly constrain beds and home-support hours.
- Implications for residents
- Continuity, response time, and quality depend on stable trained staffing.
- Implications for families
- Workforce shortages shift more care and coordination onto unpaid carers.
- Implications for investors
- Labour cost, vacancies, and immigration exposure affect margins and growth capacity.
Mapped evidence: 1 documents, 3 source signals, 1 tracker
Mapped source signals (3)
Employment New Zealand | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Pay-equity settings directly affect care-worker remuneration, provider costs, recruitment, retention, and service continuity.
Suggested source action: Track official changes alongside union, provider, and court sources, keeping claims and decisions distinct.
Evidence note: Official pay-and-gender-equity index checked 8 October 2026, linking employer obligations and guidance on raising and responding to claims. Individual claim status and settlements require separate primary evidence.
Immigration New Zealand | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Visa and residence pathways influence nursing and care-worker supply, vacancy risk, and provider operating capacity.
Suggested source action: Record only official occupation and pathway changes, with effective dates and affected roles.
Evidence note: Policy landing page; role-specific eligibility must be verified against current operational instructions.
Immigration New Zealand | Official page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Role-specific care-worker residence pathway is distinct from nursing Green List pathways and affects workforce recruitment and retention.
Suggested source action: Verify eligible roles, qualifying work, applicable sector wage, and employer accreditation against current INZ instructions for each recruitment scenario.
Evidence note: Official visa page checked 8 October 2026. Requires qualifying care-workforce experience for at least 24 months within the previous 30 months, applicable wage conditions, and a qualifying job with an accredited employer. Other criteria also apply.
Recorded tracker status: Active — Advisory report published; government decisions watch | Priority: High | Tracker updated: 8 October 2026
Recorded next milestone: Government decisions, funding, and implementation responsibilities for advisory recommendations.
Mapped evidence documents (1)
RNZ News | MD | Recorded class: Sector evidence
Published: 2026-06-17 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Funding allocation and expected provider behaviour are not measured expenditure or service delivery. About 95% occupancy and 12,000 additional beds are sector commentary in RNZ, not a defined national survey in the inspected source. The bundled by-2032 timing, $12.4m component, $1,700/$370 daily costs and 1.3m by 2040 projection were not established by the inspected RNZ article or official release and are omitted pending separate primary evidence.
Recorded publication status: published | Public record: Yes
Home and community support redesign
Recorded check: 2026-10-09 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
- Recorded policy status
- 2026/27 operational funding terms; wider reform proposals await decisions
- Why it matters
- Ageing at home depends on assessment, service availability, travel, workforce, respite, equipment, and clear ACC-versus-health pathways.
- Next expected event in this snapshot
- Government reform decisions and verified support activity; additional IBT payment assessments are scheduled for 31 December 2026 and 30 June 2027.
- Suggested SNZ action
- Use doc-1625 for published HCSS/IBT funding conditions: 2.66% base and an additional 1.1% offered subject to agreed efficiency targets. Verify provider uptake, payments and actual client hours separately from terms and wider reform proposals.
- Implications for providers
- Commissioning and service specifications may change operating models and reporting.
- Implications for residents
- Reliable support can delay or avoid residential care and hospital admission.
- Implications for families
- Gaps in formal support increase carer burden and navigation work.
- Implications for investors
- Home-first policy may affect residential demand mix and community-service opportunities.
Mapped evidence: 5 documents, 4 source signals
Mapped source signals (4)
Ministry of Health / Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group | Official page | Recorded signal status: Already in library | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Independent advisory report published 17 August 2026 with 40 recommendations on service integration, regulation, funding, and implementation.
Suggested source action: Capture the report, summary, and September FAQ update in the document library; track government decisions and funding separately from recommendations.
Evidence note: Official publication page checked 8 October 2026. Report publication date: 17 August 2026; supporting FAQs updated September 2026. Advice informs future policy and funding decisions; the page does not establish adopted reforms.
Health New Zealand | Official page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Core live source for aged-care funding, service-model reform, and government sequencing.
Suggested source action: Monitor for review updates and capture a source brief whenever milestones, reports, or consultation papers appear.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Health New Zealand | Official page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Consumer and service pathway source for NASC, interRAI, home support, and entry into residential care.
Suggested source action: Use as a live pathway source for consumer guidance, home-support category pages, and document cross-links.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Seniorline | Official page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-09-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Seniorline is a practical entry point for assessment, home support, respite, and residential-care navigation.
Suggested source action: Map regional NASC contacts and verify referral instructions at least quarterly.
Evidence note: Health-sector navigation source; local service details can change and require regional checking.
Mapped evidence documents (5)
Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2026-08-17 | Accessed: 8 October 2026
Evidence boundary: The report contains independent recommendations to inform government decisions. Publication does not prove that recommendations are adopted, funded or implemented. Publication date is from the Ministry landing page, separate from this verification date.
Health New Zealand | Brief | Recorded class: Official guidance
Published: 2026-08 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Catalogue publication uses the operational PDF’s August 2026 cover month, with no exact issue day established. October 7 is the page update date, not the PDF cover date or a verified start of payments. Official seven-page PDF downloaded and checked: physical pages 4–5 define funding and assessment conditions. Terms do not prove provider acceptance, money spent, additional care hours or adoption of the 40 independent advisory recommendations. Direct web-tool page retrieval returned403 but direct publisher HTML and PDF downloads succeeded.
Ministry of Health | PDF | Recorded class: Official guidance
Published: 2020-08-27 | Accessed: June 2026
Evidence boundary: Historical August 2020 commissioning/design framework for DHB-funded older-person HCSS, not an eight-page binding national standard or a current all-age disability-service guide. Original 29-page PDF and live primary PDF are byte-identical. Its 2017/18 expenditure, 2018 consultation, demographic forecasts, historical funding rules and agency structure are time-bound. July 2021/2022 development and rollout dates are intentions; implementation was not established by this review. Appendices contain draft/unconfirmed measures, not present service guarantees. Source identity and full text were reviewed, but current contracts, eligibility, workforce rules and all clinical/legal propositions were not comprehensively audited. Preserve the original filename, category and June 2026 access label; publication, September technical production and October 2026 evidence review are distinct.
Health New Zealand / Disability Support Services / Inland Revenue | MD | Recorded class: Official guidance
Published: Not recorded | Accessed: June 2026
Evidence boundary: Composite primary guidance checked 9 October 2026; original publication unknown and June capture/access preserved. Health NZ older-person/health-related support and DSS disability support have distinct funding, assessment and purchasing scopes despite a shared claims processor. Page updates are not publication dates; the April policy date applies to DSS. The exact four-hour and $2,075 equality boundaries remain source wording discrepancies. The earlier Work and Income product URL returned 404; blanket tax-free, $80–$82 and all-stream April-policy assertions were removed. Full earlier capture and exact primary references/page text are preserved in artifacts/research/launch-supergold-carer-source-audit-2026-10-09.json.
Health New Zealand | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2024-01-16 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Bundled PDF cover and official indexed publisher metadata establish January 2024. Direct Health NZ browser retrieval was restricted. Regional occupancy figures cite the NZACA 2023 survey; original response sample and bed denominator were not independently established in this capture. Preserve those limits and reference periods.
Recorded publication status: published | Public record: Yes
Dementia Mate Wareware implementation
Recorded check: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
- Recorded policy status
- Government noted 14 inquiry recommendations on 10 March 2026
- Why it matters
- Diagnosis, post-diagnostic support, respite, workforce, culturally safe care, and dementia-bed capacity require coordinated implementation.
- Next expected event in this snapshot
- Funding commitments, implementation responsibilities, and regional service updates.
- Suggested SNZ action
- Compare the sector plan, Health Committee inquiry response, and August advisory report. Noting recommendations is not a funding commitment; record responsible agencies and funded actions separately.
- Implications for providers
- Demand for dementia-capable community and residential services will continue to increase.
- Implications for residents
- Earlier diagnosis and culturally safe support influence independence and wellbeing.
- Implications for families
- Navigation, respite, legal planning, and carer support remain practical pressure points.
- Implications for investors
- Dementia demand creates capacity needs but also workforce and quality risks.
Mapped evidence: 3 documents, 4 source signals, 1 tracker
Mapped source signals (4)
New Zealand Government | Official page | Recorded signal status: Capture candidate | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: The 10 March 2026 response noted all 14 Health Committee recommendations on residential care, home support, carers, and workforce.
Suggested source action: Capture the formal response and map each recommendation to government decisions, agency responsibilities, and funded delivery evidence.
Evidence note: Ministerial release dated 10 March 2026, checked 8 October. The response notes recommendations and refers many to existing aged-care work; it does not confirm all recommendations are funded or implemented.
Ministry of Health / Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group | Official page | Recorded signal status: Already in library | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-10-08 | Scheduled review: 2026-10-22
Recorded reliability: Official primary | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Independent advisory report published 17 August 2026 with 40 recommendations on service integration, regulation, funding, and implementation.
Suggested source action: Capture the report, summary, and September FAQ update in the document library; track government decisions and funding separately from recommendations.
Evidence note: Official publication page checked 8 October 2026. Report publication date: 17 August 2026; supporting FAQs updated September 2026. Advice informs future policy and funding decisions; the page does not establish adopted reforms.
Alzheimers New Zealand | PDF | Recorded signal status: Already in library | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-07-22
Recorded reliability: Sector body | Confidence: High
Why it matters: Current sector-led dementia roadmap covering brain health, diagnosis, community support, workforce, and governance.
Suggested source action: Keep linked to dementia funding analysis, aged-care reform, and political campaign tracking.
Evidence note: Monitoring record reviewed on 22 June 2026. Capture the dated source page or publication before reusing a changed factual claim.
Dementia New Zealand | Watch page | Recorded signal status: Monitor | Priority: High
Signal checked: 2026-06-22 | Scheduled review: 2026-09-22
Recorded reliability: Community provider | Confidence: Medium
Why it matters: Regional dementia support, education, and navigation evidence complements national policy and prevalence research.
Suggested source action: Map regional services, respite information, and culturally specific support gaps.
Evidence note: Service-provider source; service availability should be confirmed by region.
Recorded tracker status: Active — Inquiry response and DSS Act implementation watch | Priority: High | Tracker updated: 8 October 2026
Recorded next milestone: Funded dementia actions and implementation guidance under the Disability Support Services Act 2026.
Mapped evidence documents (3)
Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2026-08-17 | Accessed: 8 October 2026
Evidence boundary: The report contains independent recommendations to inform government decisions. Publication does not prove that recommendations are adopted, funded or implemented. Publication date is from the Ministry landing page, separate from this verification date.
2026-06-10_0030_Prompt32_DementiaMateWarewareUpdates | MD
Published: 2026 | Accessed: June 2026
Health New Zealand | PDF | Recorded class: Independent evaluation
Published: 2024-01-16 | Accessed: 9 October 2026
Evidence boundary: Bundled PDF cover and official indexed publisher metadata establish January 2024. Direct Health NZ browser retrieval was restricted. Regional occupancy figures cite the NZACA 2023 survey; original response sample and bed denominator were not independently established in this capture. Preserve those limits and reference periods.
Recorded publication status: published | Public record: Yes
Counts cover the complete saved inventory, before filters. The high-priority metric covers all 52 public source signals. Across all 12 watch cards, explicit mappings resolve to 29 distinct source signals, 20 distinct documents and 5 distinct trackers. Repeated links are counted once. 0 mapped references are unresolved.
Public document date metadata: 557 documents have sortable recorded dates; 20 have unknown or unsupported date precision. Latest sortable recorded publication: 2026-09-03. Partial dates retain their recorded precision; access dates are never substituted.