Skip to main content
Back

E tū / CICTAR — Transparency and Corporate Tax Reforms in Aged Residential Care Funding (2025)

E tū and Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research (CICTAR)

Publisher: E tū / CICTAR

Funding & Finance
PDF
E tū and Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research (CICTAR)
Published 2025-05-05
Authority4/5Freshness3/5Relevance5/5KB value4/5
Evidence class

Sector evidence

Sector body

Reviewed

2026-10-09

Next review not yet scheduled

Scope

New Zealand

High confidence

Status

verified

SNZ editorial review

Evidence boundary: Joint union/tax-accountability research published 5 May 2025; 21 physical pages, with original June 2026 capture label. Company analysis covers a decade ending December 2024. Accounting tax expense and cash tax payments are different measures. Estimates and advocacy recommendations are attributed to the authors; Bupa’s response and the explicit no-illegality disclaimer are retained. This is not an official tax determination or proof of current funding/tax reform.

Short Answer

Edward Miller’s joint E tū/CICTAR report advocates greater transparency over aged residential care public funding and corporate tax arrangements, drawing on company financial statements and a Bupa New Zealand case study.

Key Points

  • •CICTAR’s listing dates publication to 5 May 2025. The original has 21 physical pages and is prepared by Edward Miller with E tū; its contents include the company response and references (physical pp. 2, 17–21).
  • •The authors argue that privately held providers’ financial filings do not consistently disclose their ARC public funding, while listed-provider notes provide some subsidy data. They propose a public funding database, not an already operating one (printed pp. 5–6, 15).
  • •For Bupa Care Services New Zealand Limited over the decade to 31 December 2024, the authors calculate $292.7 million of cumulative pre-tax profit and $11.6 million of net income tax expense, about 4%. These are accounting measures (printed p. 11).
  • •The same report gives cash tax payments of $24.9 million over that decade, about 8% of pre-tax profit. The roughly $12 million tax-expense headline should not be relabelled as the total cash tax paid (printed p. 11).
  • •The authors estimate that intercompany interest reduced taxable income by $150.6 million, with a possible $27.1 million revenue effect under their method. This is an attributed estimate, not an Inland Revenue assessment (printed pp. 12–14).
  • •Recommendations cover funding disclosure, reviewing capital-gains treatment, considering an interest-deduction limit alongside thin-capitalisation rules, and exploring public as well as private provision. They are proposals, not adopted law (printed p. 15).

Full Summary & Notes

Edward Miller’s joint E tū/CICTAR report advocates greater transparency over aged residential care public funding and corporate tax arrangements, drawing on company financial statements and a Bupa New Zealand case study. It compares listed-provider disclosures with privately held providers and proposes a public funding database and tax-policy review. The original distinguishes accounting tax expense from cash tax payments and includes Bupa’s response that it complies with tax law and prices related-party transactions at arm’s length. These are attributed research claims and policy proposals, with no allegation of illegality, rather than an official tax finding or enacted reform.

Read bundled source notes

The saved source file may include fuller notes and references than the indexed summary. Check its dates and evidence limits.

Loading saved source notes…

Download saved notes

Document Details & Metadata

Related Resources

PDF
Medium
Productivity Commission — Case Study: Aged Residential Care (Immigration Inquiry, 2022)

Elizabeth Knopf’s March 2022 desk review examines aged residential care as an input to the Productivity Commission’s immigration inquiry.

6 indexed content areas
Elizabeth Knopf, prepared for the New Zealand Productivity Commission2022-05-28
Funding & Finance
PDF
High
HCHA Open Letter on Fuel Costs and In-Between Travel Funding

HCHA's letter to the Minister of Finance argues that rapidly rising fuel costs and inadequate In-Between Travel reimbursement threaten continuity of home care, especially in rural and remote communities.

5 indexed content areas
Home and Community Health Association25 March 2026
Funding & Finance
PDF
Medium
Ministry of Health — Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group: Terms of Reference (December 2025)

These five-page terms define the independent Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group’s remit across home/community support and aged residential care, including respite and transitional services.

6 indexed content areas
Ministry of Health — Manatū HauoraDecember 2025
Funding & Finance
MD
High
2026 Office for Seniors - Web Capture - Digital Literacy Training for Seniors

The Office for Seniors delivered the Digital Literacy Training for Seniors programme from 2019.

6 indexed content areas
Office for Seniors2026
Funding & Finance
PDF
High
Young Company Finance - Autumn 2026

NZGCP's Autumn 2026 market report describes a strong headline year for New Zealand young-company investment with capital concentrated in later rounds and VC-led deals.

5 indexed content areas
New Zealand Growth Capital PartnersAutumn 2026
Funding & Finance
Brief
High
Home and Community Support versus Residential Care Cost Comparison

RNZ reports headline findings from a January 2024 Sapere analysis for Health NZ comparing public spending on subsidised residential care and home and community support.

5 indexed content areas
Sapere Research Group / RNZMarch 2026
Funding & Finance